Shari’ah Supervisory Board Composition Effects On Islamic Banks’ Risk-Taking Behavior
نویسنده
چکیده
Islamic banks underlie the fundamental principles of the Shari’ah, which encompass all business activities, financial contracts, and transactions. The Shari’ah Supervisory Board (SSB) monitors and certifies compliancy and is unique to the governance structure of Islamic banks compared to their Western counterparts. This study addresses the question of how the compositional characteristics of the SSB influence the loan portfolio risk-taking of Islamic banks. As such, we analyze to which degree the legal supervisory functions of a SSB affect the banks’ risk-taking behavior. Over the period from 2000 to 2010, we regard cross-country bank-level data from the Middle East and Northern Africa as well as from Southeast Asia. Our results reveal evidence that the loan portfolio risk-taking of Islamic banks is positively influenced by increasing size of the SSB, as well as when top ranked Shari’ah scholars with multiple memberships have board mandates and when annual changes occur in the composition of a SSB, regarding particularly previous period variables with second lags. We find that supervisory effectiveness and disciplining power of individual bank SSBs towards the risk-taking in the loan portfolio of Islamic banks decreases in a decentralized Shari’ah-compliant governance structure. The reverse causality analysis shows strongly that SSB factors affect primarily loan portfolio risk-taking, not the other way around.
منابع مشابه
Mode of Islamic Bank Financing: Does Effectiveness of Shari’ah Supervisory Board Matter?
This paper examines the relationships between the effectiveness of board (SSB), their remuneration and mode of financing effectiveness is evaluated by an index based on 9 attributes score. This study comprises 18 Islamic banks in which operating in Malaysia from the year 2012 to 2014 a sample. Our regression analysis shows that the effectiveness of SSB does not concern with the mode of Islamic ...
متن کاملFirm Size as a Moderator between Corporate Governance and Risk-Taking in Malaysian Banks
This study investigates the moderating effect of firm size in the relationship between corporate governance (board size, board independence and ownership concentration) and banks’ risk-taking (insolvency risk and credit risk). Secondary data (annual reports) was collected from a sample of 21 Malaysian commercial banks covering the 2005–2014 accounting period. An empirical model using pooled ord...
متن کاملA Wavelet-based Approach to Testing Shari’ah-compliant Stock Market Contagion: Evidence from the ASEAN Countries
Recently there has been a heightened global concern over ‘contagion’ in the conventional financial markets. Our study is motivated by the desire to test empirically whether this contagion is reflected in the fast growing Islamic financial markets as well. This study is the first attempt at testing whether there has been any contagion among the Shari’ah-compliant stock markets during the most re...
متن کاملBoard Compensation and Risk-Taking: The Moderating Role of CEO Duality (Evidence from Banking Industry)
The purpose of this paper is to explore relationship between board compensation and risk taking with regard to CEO duality in the banking industry. Using a panel data regression model, with regard to optimal contracting and managerial power theory, we examined the data to determine the relationship between board compensation and risk taking of twenty one banks, for the period 2012 to 2018. R...
متن کاملManagerial Overconfidence and Bank Risk Taking: A Cross-Country Analysis
This paper examines the effects of managerial overconfidence on bank risk taking and investigates whether improvements in governance can help to mitigate the adverse effects of managerial overconfidence on bank risk taking by using ordinary least squares method. The sample consists of the financial institutions in G20 and Taiwan over the period of 2005-2012. The executive overconfidence is meas...
متن کامل